David Cook (davidcook) wrote,
David Cook

  • Mood:

Last weekend - the Scottish Open

Ok, about time I wrote up the Scottish Open, which took place last Saturday.

The brief version: 70 or so entries, I came somewhere around 14-16th.

Equipment : 9/10. One body-wire mysteriously decided to stop working, after I briefly unplugged to move my water bottle and towel and spare bits to the other end of the piste. When I connected up again, it wasn't working ... Otherwise, everything was ok.
Fitness : 5/10. Three weeks away from the gym and fencing training, and I had just got over a cold.
Hydration : 9/10. Not a problem.
Food : 8/10. I seemed to have enough energy.
Mental state : 7/10. Generally better than the Miller-Hallet. Final bout was a bit wierd. I needed to be a bit more aggressive, I think.
Sleep : 7/10. I was closer to enough than at the last couple of comps, at least ...

So, 70 fencers (well, 70 had signed in at the start of the day; somehow two of them went missing by the time the first round of pools started). The format seemed normal (two rounds of pools, then the DE), but there was a twist. Normally, if there are two rounds of pools, then the results from the first round are used to derive rankings to seed the second round. The results from the second round (only) then give rankings which seed the DE.
Also, after the first round the bottom-ranked fencers are eliminated, to leave the number of remaining fencers divisible by 7. All pools in the second round can then be the same size, which makes the ranking process a) easier, and b) slightly more likely to be fair and accurate.

Instead, on Saturday, the results from the two rounds were combined to give the rankings for the DE. Given that the pools in both rounds were not all the same size (mostly 6, some had 5 - e.g. mine, after one person failed to appear), I'm not entirely convinced that the method is sound.
For example, in both rounds, I was in a pool of 5. I only lost one bout in each round, so my final victory ratio was 0.75. However, if I'd been in pools of 6 and only lost one bout each round, it would have been 0.8, and I would have been about 8 places higher going in to the DE.

Anyway, I was fencing ok in the first round of pools. We had a long wait before the second round started, as we had to wait for the women's epee pools to finish, then the first round of men's and women's sabre pools to finish. I was standing around watching rwrylsin fence in her pool, when someone called me from across the room - apparently my second round pool had found a piste and I was supposed to be on the piste for a bout !
I ran to my fencing bag, quickly removed my tracksuit, grabbed my equipment and got on the piste - naturally, full of adrenalin. Fortunately, that helped in this bout - I was against someone who seemed the sort of person who had quite a bit of fencing ability, but possibly not the discipline required to go places with it. Being able to land flick hits (with an epee) in the middle of someone's back or at someone's back leg is impressive, but ... well, Seamus does it much better, and on a good day I used to usually stop him hitting me with those hits (he just goes on and hits me with something else from his bag of tricks of course, but that's Seamus). This fencer was good, but he was no Seamus, so I managed to beat him 5-4.
The adrenalin level stayed high for the rest of the pool, and I think it helped - I was fencing pretty well, and only lost one bout - 4-5 to the person who'd come through ranked first after the first round.

So, I was ranked 20th going in to the DE. The first bout went well for me - my opponent was mostly a foilist, and liked charging at me a lot (often with his point aimed somewhere other than at me). The second one was slightly odd - I think my opponent was either nervous, or very defensive - I can't recall him making many attacking moves, or doing ... much of anything, except parrying. Fortunately, I made more successful attacks than mistakes, and won that one too.
Finally, in the round of 16, I lost 13-15, in a slightly strange bout. The way the DE is run, groups of 8 fencers run through three rounds of elimination. One of the other fencers in the group recognized me from an earlier comp. (probably the Welsh Open), and while we were chatting, just before his second round bout, said that he'd like to fence me, but he'd have to beat his next opponent (who was 4th-ranked going in to the DE) first ... and he did. I decided that that opponent of his had underestimated him, so I wouldn't. As a result, I fenced the bout cautiously - but possibly too much so. While I got ahead 3-2 early, he caught up again, and then got ahead by a couple of hits. Once he did that, all he had to do was engineer as many double hits as possible, and leave me little time to work him out - and he did that quite well. I never got fully on top of the situation - and somehow it felt inevitable, at 12-13 down, when I thought I had made a hit (blade bent slightly and all), but the box failed to go off and he hit me. My epee was working fine (got the president to test it), but the hit must have been flat. One more double, and he had won.

And that was the end of my day. Overall, not a bad day, although I was hoping to get through a couple more rounds of the DE and at least equal my 3rd from the Highland Open, but it was not to be. Next year for sure, I guess. (Without the cold next time !)

Tags: fencing

  • Books read in 2017 ...

    Angel of Storms - Trudi Canavan The Rhesus Chart - Charles Stross Magic for Nothing - Seanan McGuire The Annihilation Score - Charles Stross An…

  • DW and LJ

    In case anyone is looking for me on Dreamwidth, same username as on LJ (since, ummm ... 2009 !) Original post on Dreamwidth - there are…

  • Movies in 2015 ...

    Well, I'm cheating a bit, because I only saw one at the cinema, Star Wars: The Force Awakens, but I want to note down a few thoughts I had on it ...…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.